Wednesday, April 28, 2010

4/29 - Byron York, Robert Peteres, Jim Kouri

Talkback Thu Apr 29, 2010
Chuck Wilder Noon- 2 PM PDST

Byron York The Washington Examiner's chief political correspondent. He blogs throughout the week at Beltway Confidential. His article " A carefully crafted immigration law in Arizona"

Robert Peters President of Morality in Media " Crime Family Busted Selling 15 Year old Girls"

Jim Kouri Vice President of the National Association of Chiefs of Police , writer for News With Views.Com and Examiner.Com "U.S. Navy ship named for corrupt congressman also U.S. homeland vulnerable to Iranian threat , and a look at Jim's Latest stories"
( ( To subscribe to Kouri's newsletter write to and write "Subscription" on the subject line.
Tea Party terriorst ??


Talkback is repeated on So. California KSPA 1510 Midnight - 2 AM PDST
also Midnight- 2 AM PDST on CRN CH 4

This might be funny if it weren't so darned true. Be sure to read all the way to the end:

Tax his land, Tax his bed, Tax the table At which he's fed. Tax his tractor, Tax his mule, Teach him taxes Are the rule. Tax his work, Tax his pay, He works for peanuts Anyway! Tax his cow, Tax his goat, Tax his pants, Tax his coat. Tax his ties, Tax his shirt, Tax his work, Tax his dirt. Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink, Tax him if he Tries to think. Tax his cigars, Tax his beers, If he cries Tax his tears. Tax his car, Tax his gas, Find other ways To tax his ass. Tax all he has Then let him know That you won't be done Till he has no dough. When he screams and hollers; Then tax him some more, Tax him till He's good and sore. Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave, Tax the sod in Which he's laid. Put these words Upon his tomb, Taxes drove me to my doom...'

When he's gone, Do not relax, Its time to apply The inheritance tax. Accounts Receivable Tax Building Permit Tax CDL license Tax Cigarette Tax Corporate Income Tax Dog License Tax Excise Taxes Federal Income Tax Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Fishing License Tax Food License Tax Fuel Permit Tax Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon) Gross Receipts Tax Hunting License Tax Inheritance Tax Inventory Tax IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) Liquor Tax Luxury Taxes Marriage License Tax Medicare Tax Personal Property Tax Property Tax Real Estate Tax Service Charge T ax Social Security Tax Road Usage Tax Sales Tax Recreational Vehicle Tax School Tax State Income Tax State Unemployment Tax (SUTA) Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge=2 0Tax Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax Telephone State and Local Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax Vehicle Sales Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Well Permit Tax Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY? Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids. What in the hell happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'And I still have to 'press 1' for English!?

1 comment:

  1. ARIZONA LAW VS HOLDER LAW: Which is justice by color?

    The liberal news media are newsing breathlessly that Attorney General Eric Holder is contemplating legal action against Arizona because there is the "potential for abuse" under the new Arizona law requiring illegal aliens to produce a green card or other proof of being illegally in the country.

    Could this be a case of justice by color (or, perhaps more politically-correctly, "justice of color," or by race?

    I ask for the reason that Holder appears very concerned and upset by the "potential abuse" (even though under all aliens are required by federal law to carry their green cards or other proof on their person, and the Arizona law in fact authorizes inquiry by police only when there has been contact with a person based on other grounds). But Holder is not at all upset and concerned about actual abuse.

    Consider the case of the black African-American thugs who menaced voters with clubs at polls in the 2008 Obama election, for the purpose, they said, of ensuring that black candidates (e.g., Obama) were elected. The Justice Department filed a suit against them; they failed to respond; a default was entered against them. The judge ordered the DOJ attorneys to prepare the default judgment. AG Holder's office intervened, stopped the judgment from being filed, although it was a default judgment. All defendants but one walked away as if nothing happened at the polls: the other had a meaningless wrist-slap "injunction" imposed against him.

    This was a case of actual abuse: Holder not only did not prosecute, he undid a default judgment.

    Consider the case of the Purple Shirts of SEIU beating down black African-American Ken Gladney, and calling him a "N---er" as they beat him (at least one Purple Shirt was also black), for his "crime" of passing out Gadston Flags at a Missouri Tea Party. The local authorities dragged their feet, finally, after public pressure, charging these Purple Shirt thugs with ordinance violations. The Purple Shirt thugs, who are to recently-resigned SEIU boss Andy Stern, the Alinsky-ite colleague of Obama who is his most frequent guest at the White House, what the Black Shirts were to Mussolini and the Brown Shirts to Hitler, recently pleaded "innocent" to the charges -- although, of course, their beat-down is on video tape.

    Holder has said nothing to condemn this wanton violent beating replete with the N-word. He has initiated no federal action for violation of civil rights.

    Consider that every "illegal alien" (the legal, statutory term, not "illegal immigrant" or "undocumented worker") is in fact, "illegal." Yet Holder wants to formulate an action against American police acted legally under the law, but announces no intent to act against Mexican and other illegal aliens breaking the law and being present in the U.S. "illegally."

    Could this be justice based not on the content of the perpetrator's conduct, but the color of the perpetrator's skin, his race?

    Where is the voice of the post-racial president in all of this "justice by race and color"?

    Does justice for Holder and for Obama depend on the color of the victim the color of the perpetrator?

    If so, who is the racist?